Skip to content
Thursday, October 8, 2026
WaveTech Monthly brings you the latest insights, trends, an…

The Venezuelan Crisis Could Now Define President Trump's Legacy - and the United States' Position in the Global Order

Following launching a night of shock and awe in Venezuela, Donald Trump now appears to be entering the nation-building business.

In a striking news conference at his Mar-a-Lago resort on Saturday morning, the president declared that US military forces had successfully captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an late-night operation in Caracas.

Trump then indicated that a group comprising Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, working with Venezuelans, would be assuming control of the beleaguered nation.

"We are going to run the country until such time as we can do a secure, proper and careful transition," he said.

What precisely "governing the state" involves is uncertain, but the vow represents an sudden shift in direction for the president, laden with contradictions and formidable challenges.

A president who campaigned against "forever wars", who vehemently denounced past US attempts at regime change and who promised to implement an "America First" foreign policy is now gambling his presidency on successfully reconstructing a South American nation whose economy is in shambles and whose political stability has been undermined by decades of authoritarian rule.

Yet, Trump was relentlessly upbeat.

He stated his administration has a "perfect track record of winning" – and that this will be no exception. He promised to enlist American oil firms to overhaul Venezuela's deteriorating production infrastructure, providing capital for the American rebuilding project and benefitting the Venezuelan people.

He did not exclude deploying American soldiers to Venezuela to further these efforts. "We're not afraid of boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he told reporters.

Trump, a sharp critic of the US invasion of Iraq, will now have to heed the words of one of the American architects of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "You break it, you bought it."

An Altered International Stance

The US has reshaped Venezuela's destiny – for better or worse.

Trump came to power nearly a year ago pledging to be a peacemaker, but over the past year he has shown that he is quite prepared to use military force internationally.

In the past week, he ordered air strikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he struck atomic sites in Iran, suspected drug-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, rebel forces in Yemen, militias in Somalia and jihadist fighters in Iraq.

In contrast to past actions, which have mostly involved missiles and aircraft that reduce the risk of American forces to harm, Trump's Venezuela strike – and his pledges to the fate of that nation – are markedly distinct.

His goal, he said during his briefing, is to "make Venezuela great again."

Response at Home and Abroad

That twist on Trump's "Make America Great Again" – or Maga - mantra may be tough for some of Trump's backers to digest.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a former Trump loyalist who split from the president after charging him of abandoning his core supporters, was swift to criticize the president's actions on social media.

"Americans' disgust with our own government's perpetual use of force and backing for foreign wars is justified because we are compelled to fund it," she stated. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. Boy were we wrong."

Another notable Trump detractor, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, compared the legal justification for Maduro's arrest – on weapons and cocaine trafficking charges – with Trump's reasoning that the operation was to retake confiscated US oil and stop fentanyl production.

The majority of Republican lawmakers supported the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson describing the military action against a "illegitimate government" as "firm and justified".

Strategic Justifications and Global Implications

During his appearance, the president argued the Venezuelan operation advanced his "America First" agenda because it guaranteed US hemispheric security and provided a reliable source of oil.

He revived the Monroe Doctrine – an nineteenth-century American foreign policy that asserted the Western Hemisphere should be without influence by European powers – and renamed it the "Trump Doctrine."

The action in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "US preeminence in the Western Hemisphere will not be challenged again."

The goal of the new US security policy, he said, was to "protect commerce, land and assets that are central to our security interests." He labeled the Western Hemisphere as America's "home region."

Trump's decision to apprehend Maduro will raise broader questions in global politics, however, and affect American relations with the world's other significant military powers.

The Chinese foreign ministry issued a statement voicing shock and denouncing what it said was a reckless assault on a sovereign nation.

During the previous administration, the US offered similar censures of Russia following its invasion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is trying to broker a ceasefire between those two nations – one that has often appeared to be leaning to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a centrist Republican congressman, voiced worry about the precedent Trump's actions might send.

"My main concern is now Russia will use this to excuse their illegal and brutal military actions against Ukraine, or China to rationalize an attack of Taiwan."

Opposition and Legal Scrutiny

Trump's Democratic critics were blunter.

"The United States should not be administering other countries for any reason," said a senator who serves on the Foreign Relations Committee. "We should have learned by now not to get involved in endless wars and regime change missions that carry catastrophic results for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker stated Maduro is a lawbreaker and a dictator with a record of rights violations. But he condemned Trump's decision not to inform legislative leaders before initiating the attack.

"Donald Trump has the legal duty to abide by the law and uphold democratic norms in the United States," he said. "That is what putting America First requires."

Trump, in his press conference, explained that he chose not to inform Congress because he was worried they would "disclose" details of the operation prior to the attack.

An Uncertain Future

That mission was a triumph – with zero American casualties and limited harm to US assets. Trump, with his typical bravado, portrayed the operation as a "spectacular assault" and "one of the most astonishing, effective and impressive demonstrations of American military might and proficiency in US history."

Now he is gambling his legacy on that success enduring, as the US claims it will take over running and rebuilding Venezuela - though what that truly entails remains unclear. He and his team must fortify a nation that has been in chaos for years while stabilising a hemisphere that is bound to be wary of what Trump's international strategy has in store for them.

By

Ethan Marks

Elena Voss is a seasoned tech journalist with a passion for emerging technologies and their impact on society.

WaveTech Monthly

Type to search articles.